Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro Vega II
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅32.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 475W, a 225W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌172.8% HIGHER MSRP$5,999 MSRPvs$2,199 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 7.1 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).
Radeon Pro Vega II
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $3,800 less on MSRP ($2,199 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 174.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with Unknown of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- ❌90% higher power demand at 475W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro Vega II Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512 | 15,597 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4096+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS | 14.09 TFLOPS+12% |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz | 1720 MHz+5% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 | 256+7% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+40% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II carries 0 MB. Quadro P6000 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 384-bit on the Radeon Pro Vega II. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 864 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 62.1% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-47% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0+89% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro P6000 came in at $5999, while the Radeon Pro Vega II launched at $2199. On MSRP, Radeon Pro Vega II was 63.3% cheaper ($3800 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 7.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II) — the Radeon Pro Vega II offers 173.1% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro Vega II (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | $2199-63% |
| Performance per Dollar | 2.6 | 7.1+173% |
| Codename | GP102 | Vega 20 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #141 | #138 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P6000 and Radeon Pro Vega II
