Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 7700S

NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

2016Core: 1506 MHzBoost: 1645 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 7700S

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 2500 MHz

Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 7700S Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 7700S FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 7700S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

  • 14.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 193% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

  • No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • 2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • 1236.1% HIGHER MSRP
    $5,999 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 34.6 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
  • 150% higher power demand at 250W vs 100W.

Radeon RX 7700S

2023

Why buy it

  • Costs $5,550 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Delivers 1237.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
  • Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 100W instead of 250W, a 150W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro P6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 14.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon RX 7700S instead at 15,527 vs 15,512, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 7700S is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer feature stack, with FSR 3 (2023) and FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023), while Quadro P6000 is limited to no meaningful modern upscaling stack and no comparable frame-generation support, a 6nm process instead of 16nm, 32 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 7700S makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,550 cheaper on MSRP at $449 vs $5,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 1237.4% (34.6 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P6000 vs Radeon RX 7700S Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

AMD

Radeon RX 7700S

The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2500 MHz.

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
G3D Mark Score
15,512
15,527
Architecture
Pascal
RDNA 3.0
Process Node
16 nm
6 nm
Shading Units
3840+88%
2048
Compute (TFLOPS)
12.63 TFLOPS
20.48 TFLOPS+62%
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
2500 MHz+52%
ROPs
96+50%
64
TMUs
240+88%
128
L1 Cache
1.4 MB+180%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Radeon RX 7700S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Quadro P6000 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR 3
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700S carries 8 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 193% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 288 GB/s (Radeon RX 7700S) — a 50% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 7700S. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Quadro P6000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
VRAM Capacity
23.438 GB+193%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5X
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
432 GB/s+50%
288 GB/s
Bus Width
384-bit+200%
128-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB+50%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
DirectX
12.1
12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan
1.1
1.3+18%
OpenGL
4.5
4.6+2%
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
Encoder
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
VCN 4.0
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP8
VCN 4.0
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 85.7% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
TDP
250W
100W-60%
Recommended PSU
650W
650W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
Mobile
Length
267mm
Height
111mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
85°C
Perf/Watt
62.0
155.3+150%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P6000 came in at $5999, while the Radeon RX 7700S launched at $449. On MSRP, Radeon RX 7700S was 92.5% cheaper ($5550 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 34.6 (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon RX 7700S offers 1230.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 7700S (2023 vs 2016).

FeatureQuadro P6000Radeon RX 7700S
MSRP
$5999
$449-93%
Performance per Dollar
2.6
34.6+1231%
Codename
GP102
Navi 33
Release
October 1 2016
January 4 2023
Ranking
#141
#140

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.