G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro P6000

2016

Why buy it

✅11.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅46.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (23 GB vs 16 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
500.5% HIGHER MSRP
$5,999 MSRPvs$999 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.6 vs 15.3 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs $999 MSRP).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 250W vs 70W.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

2024

Why buy it

✅Costs $5,000 less on MSRP ($999 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Delivers 490.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 15.3 vs 2.6 G3D/$ ($999 MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 250W, a 180W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 16 GB vs 23 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro P6000 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.7% in PassMark G3D (15,512 vs 15,252), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 5nm process instead of 16nm, 22 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2024 generation instead of 2016. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

RTX 2000E Ada Generation makes the most sense to buy today. It is $5,000 cheaper on MSRP at $999 vs $5,999, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 490.4% (15.3 vs 2.6), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Quadro P6000 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro P6000 vs RTX 2000E Ada Generation Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro P6000

The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.

RTX 2000E Ada Generation

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,252 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the RTX 2000E Ada Generation reaches 15,252 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
G3D Mark Score	15,512+2%	15,252
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3840+36%	2816
Compute (TFLOPS)	12.63 TFLOPS+5%	12 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1645 MHz	2130 MHz+29%
ROPs	96+100%	48
TMUs	240+173%	88
L1 Cache	1.4 MB	2.8 MB+100%
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000E Ada Generation gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro P6000 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation carries 16 GB. Quadro P6000 gives you 46.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Quadro P6000) vs 224 GB/s (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — a 92.9% advantage for the Quadro P6000. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000E Ada Generation. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
VRAM Capacity	23.438 GB+46%	16 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5X	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	432 GB/s+93%	224 GB/s
Bus Width	384-bit+200%	128-bit
L2 Cache	3 MB	12 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.5	4.6+2%
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation).

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
Encoder	NVENC 5.0 (2x)	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP8	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the RTX 2000E Ada Generation's 70W — a 112.5% difference. The RTX 2000E Ada Generation is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (RTX 2000E Ada Generation). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
TDP	250W	70W-72%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	85°C	75°C-12%
Perf/Watt	62.0	217.9+251%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro P6000 came in at $5999, while the RTX 2000E Ada Generation launched at $999. On MSRP, RTX 2000E Ada Generation was 83.3% cheaper ($5000 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 2.6 (Quadro P6000) vs 15.3 (RTX 2000E Ada Generation) — the RTX 2000E Ada Generation offers 488.5% better value. The newer card here is RTX 2000E Ada Generation (2024 vs 2016).

Feature	Quadro P6000	RTX 2000E Ada Generation
MSRP	$5999	$999-83%
Performance per Dollar	2.6	15.3+488%
Codename	GP102	AD107
Release	October 1 2016	February 12 2024
Ranking	#141	#107

Search Quadro P6000 on Amazon

Search RTX 2000E Ada Generation on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.