Quadro P6000
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro P6000
2016Why buy it
- ✅15.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($5,999 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 250W instead of 300W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 23 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2016 hardware with 23 GB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅36.5% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 23 GB).
- ✅Quadro P6000 is already legacy-tier future-proofing, so Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro P6000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $5,999 MSRP).
- ❌20% higher power demand at 300W vs 250W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro P6000 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro P6000
The Quadro P6000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,512 points. Launch price was $5,999.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro P6000 scores 15,512 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro P6000 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Quadro P6000) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 12.63 TFLOPS (Quadro P6000) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1645 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,512 | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840+7% | 3584 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 12.63 TFLOPS+17% | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1645 MHz+10% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 240+7% | 224 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB+59% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro P6000 has 23 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU carries 32 GB. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU gives you 36.5% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 384-bit on the Quadro P6000 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU. L2 Cache: 3 MB (Quadro P6000) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 23.438 GB | 32 GB+37% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Quadro P6000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Quadro P6000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP8 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Quadro P6000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 5.0 (2x) | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP8 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro P6000 draws 250W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 18.2% difference. The Quadro P6000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Quadro P6000) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W-17% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 62.0+19% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | Quadro P6000 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $5999 | — |
| Codename | GP102 | Vega 10 |
| Release | October 1 2016 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #141 | #592 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro P6000 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
