Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Radeon Pro W5700
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro W5700 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro W5700 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro W5700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 205W, a 187W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅5.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌1038.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 18W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) vs Radeon Pro W5700 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) scores 14,832 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1695 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,832+3% | 14,380 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 896 | 2304+157% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.037 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS+193% |
| Boost Clock | 1695 MHz | 1930 MHz+14% |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 56 | 144+157% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is support for DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W5700 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W5700 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 4 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 4) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) has 16 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 carries 8 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro W5700. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 4 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: 5th Gen NVDEC vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 7th Gen NVENC | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | 5th Gen NVDEC | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) draws 18W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 167.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-91% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 824.0+1075% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $799 |
| Codename | TU117 | Navi 10 |
| Release | December 2 2020 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #548 | #163 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) and Radeon Pro W5700
