
Quadro RTX 4000

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile): Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅27.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌788.9% higher power demand at 160W vs 18W.
Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
2020Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 18W instead of 160W, a 142W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)
The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1695 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,832 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) reaches 14,832 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 896 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3.037 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1695 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 14,832 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+157% | 896 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS+134% | 3.037 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1695 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+100% | 32 |
| TMUs | 144+157% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+161% | 0.88 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both cards support Frame Generation, but the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is on the newer stack with DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation, while the Quadro RTX 4000 stays on DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation.The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) supports the newer DLSS 4 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | DLSS 4 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | DLSS 4 Multi Frame Generation+14% |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | Yes (DLSS 4)+14% |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) carries 16 GB. Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile). L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 1 MB (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+300% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)'s 18W — a 159.6% difference. The Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile)). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 18W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 824.0+783% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) (2020 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Quadro RTX 5000 (Mobile) |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | TU117 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | December 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #154 | #548 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














