Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon RX 6700S
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6700S Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6700S FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6700S: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅2.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Radeon RX 6700S is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌87.7% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$479 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 31.4 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $479 MSRP).
- ❌100% higher power demand at 160W vs 80W.
Radeon RX 6700S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 89.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 31.4 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($479 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 160W, a 80W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro RTX 4000 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6700S Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Radeon RX 6700S
The Radeon RX 6700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1700 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,061 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon RX 6700S reaches 15,061 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6700S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6700S). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 7.168 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6700S). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2000 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6700S) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 15,061 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 7.168 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2000 MHz+29% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+29% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6700S relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6700S leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6700S) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6700S. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6700S) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6700S). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6700S). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6700S).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6700S's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The Radeon RX 6700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 188.3+102% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 came in at $899, while the Radeon RX 6700S launched at $479. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6700S was 46.7% cheaper ($420 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 31.4 (Radeon RX 6700S) — the Radeon RX 6700S offers 89.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6700S (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon RX 6700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $479-47% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6 | 31.4+89% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #154 | #151 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon RX 6700S
