G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
❌220% higher power demand at 160W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅7.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Better long-term bet: Ada Lovelace on 5nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 160W, a 110W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $899 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 7.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro RTX 4000 instead at 14,925 vs 14,909, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 5nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Quadro RTX 4000 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and lighter 1440p, Quadro RTX 4000 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and lighter 1440p headroom, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 14,909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2115 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 24 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) with 288 Tensor cores vs 96.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	14,925	14,909
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.119 TFLOPS	12.99 TFLOPS+82%
Boost Clock	1545 MHz	2115 MHz+37%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	144+50%	96
L1 Cache	2.3 MB	3 MB+30%
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%
Ray Tracing Cores	36+50%	24
Tensor Cores	288+200%	96

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the Quadro RTX 4000 is capped at DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	Yes (DLSS 3.5)	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 128-bit on the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	448 GB/s+75%	256 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	NVENC 7.0	NVENC (Ada)
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP10	NVDEC (Ada)
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85.

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	160W	50W-69%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	241mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	80°C-6%	85
Perf/Watt	93.3	298.2+220%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile (2023 vs 2018).

Feature	Quadro RTX 4000	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
MSRP	$899	—
Codename	TU104	AD107
Release	November 13 2018	March 21 2023
Ranking	#154	#155

Search Quadro RTX 4000 on Amazon

Search RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.