Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6600

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000

2018Core: 1005 MHzBoost: 1545 MHz
Similar parts
···
VS
AMD

Radeon RX 6600

2021Core: 1626 MHzBoost: 2491 MHz
RX family
·······

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6600 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6600 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro RTX 4000

2018

Why buy it

  • Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Radeon RX 6600 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
  • 173.3% HIGHER MSRP
    $899 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 45.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
  • 21.2% higher power demand at 160W vs 132W.

Radeon RX 6600

2021

Why buy it

  • 1.3% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Costs $570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • Delivers 176.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 132W instead of 160W, a 28W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon RX 6600 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.3% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.1% in PassMark G3D (15,089 vs 14,925), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon RX 6600 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 7nm process instead of 12nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2018. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon RX 6600 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $570 cheaper on MSRP at $329 vs $899, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 176.3% (45.9 vs 16.6), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon RX 6600 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro RTX 4000

The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

AMD

Radeon RX 6600

The Radeon RX 6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 13 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1626 MHz to 2491 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 132W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,089 points. Launch price was $329.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon RX 6600 reaches 15,089 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 8.928 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2491 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 28 (Radeon RX 6600) with 288 Tensor cores.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
G3D Mark Score
14,925
15,089+1%
Architecture
Turing
RDNA 2.0
Process Node
12 nm
7 nm
Shading Units
2304+29%
1792
Compute (TFLOPS)
7.119 TFLOPS
8.928 TFLOPS+25%
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
2491 MHz+61%
ROPs
64
64
TMUs
144+29%
112
L1 Cache
2.3 MB+360%
0.5 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
36+29%
28

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Both GPUs support Frame Generation, but they get there through different ecosystems. The Quadro RTX 4000 uses DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while the Radeon RX 6600 relies on FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. Both can help smooth out supported games, but they are not on the same feature stack.The Quadro RTX 4000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon RX 6600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
Upscaling Tech
DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
FSR 3
Frame Generation
DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction
Yes (DLSS 3.5)
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 6600) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 128-bit on the Radeon RX 6600. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
VRAM Capacity
8 GB
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s+100%
224 GB/s
Bus Width
256-bit+100%
128-bit
L2 Cache
4 MB+100%
2 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 6600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
DirectX
12.2+2%
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.1
1.4+27%
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCE (Radeon RX 6600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
Encoder
NVENC 7.0
VCE
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP10
UVD
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9
H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon RX 6600's 132W — a 19.2% difference. The Radeon RX 6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 450W (Radeon RX 6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 8-pin. Card length: 241mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 70°C.

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
TDP
160W
132W-18%
Recommended PSU
500W
450W-10%
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 8-pin
Length
241mm
190mm
Height
111mm
110mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
80°C
70°C-13%
Perf/Watt
93.3
114.3+23%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 came in at $899, while the Radeon RX 6600 launched at $329. On MSRP, Radeon RX 6600 was 63.4% cheaper ($570 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 45.9 (Radeon RX 6600) — the Radeon RX 6600 offers 176.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon RX 6600 (2021 vs 2018).

FeatureQuadro RTX 4000Radeon RX 6600
MSRP
$899
$329-63%
Performance per Dollar
16.6
45.9+177%
Codename
TU104
Navi 23
Release
November 13 2018
October 13 2021
Ranking
#154
#150

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.