
Quadro RTX 4000

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $4,100 less on MSRP ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 463% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 16.6 vs 2.9 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $4,999 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 400W, a 240W reduction.
- ✅Measures 241mm instead of 267mm, a 26mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro W6800X Duo across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 64 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
2021Why buy it
- ✅40.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅700% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (64 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌456.1% HIGHER MSRP$4,999 MSRPvs$899 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.9 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($4,999 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 400W vs 160W.
- ❌10.8% longer card at 267mm vs 241mm.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon Pro W6800X Duo Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

Radeon Pro W6800X Duo
The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 1967 MHz. It has 3840 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 400W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 60 ×2 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,742 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo reaches 14,742 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 15.11 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1967 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 60 ×2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925+1% | 14,742 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840 ×2+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 15.11 TFLOPS ×2+112% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 1967 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 | 96 ×2+50% |
| TMUs | 144 | 240 ×2+67% |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+207% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36 | 60 ×2+67% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro W6800X Duo leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 has 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo carries 64 GB. Radeon Pro W6800X Duo gives you 700% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 576 GB/s (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — a 28.6% advantage for the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 256-bit on the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 64 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 576 GB/s+29% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 8.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 8+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCN 3.0 (2x) (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0 (2x). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 (2x) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo's 400W — a 85.7% difference. The Quadro RTX 4000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-60% | 400W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 2-50% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C-6% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3+153% | 36.9 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 came in at $899, while the Radeon Pro W6800X Duo launched at $4999. On MSRP, Quadro RTX 4000 was 82% cheaper ($4100 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2.9 (Radeon Pro W6800X Duo) — the Quadro RTX 4000 offers 472.4% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Pro W6800X Duo (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon Pro W6800X Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899-82% | $4999 |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6+472% | 2.9 |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 21 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #154 | #157 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














