Quadro RTX 4000 vs RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Per Dollar RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is significantly newer (2024 vs 2018). The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro RTX 4000 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace / 5nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro RTX 4000 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 14,923 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2130 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 22 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) with 288 Tensor cores vs 88.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 14,923 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+69% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2130 MHz+38% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 2.8 MB+22% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+64% | 22 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+227% | 88 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 256 GB/s (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — a 75% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+75% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 104.8% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 50W-69% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 298.5+220% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $220 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | AD107 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #154 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
