Quadro RTX 4000
Radeon PRO W6600
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon PRO W6600 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon PRO W6600: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro RTX 4000
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer long-term pick here because the hardware is newer and the feature stack is stronger.
- ❌38.5% HIGHER MSRP$899 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 16.6 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($899 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ❌60% higher power demand at 160W vs 100W.
Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅5.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 38.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 16.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $899 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 160W, a 60W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro RTX 4000 vs Radeon PRO W6600 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the Radeon PRO W6600 reaches 14,932 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 2903 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 28 (Radeon PRO W6600) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 14,932 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 10.4 TFLOPS+46% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz | 2903 MHz+88% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB+360% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+29% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The clearest feature edge for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. In games that support it, that can smooth out motion and lift perceived FPS. The Radeon PRO W6600 does not have comparable native support in the same tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6600 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 8 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600) — a 100% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the Quadro RTX 4000 and 256-bit on the Radeon PRO W6600. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+100% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 241mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 100W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 149.3+60% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Quadro RTX 4000 came in at $899, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6600 was 27.8% cheaper ($250 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 16.6 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon PRO W6600 offers 38.6% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6600 (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $649-28% |
| Performance per Dollar | 16.6 | 23.0+39% |
| Codename | TU104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #154 | #153 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro RTX 4000 and Radeon PRO W6600
