
Quadro RTX 4000 vs GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Quadro RTX 4000
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro RTX 4000
Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro RTX 4000 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.1%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Turing (2018−2022)) | 🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere / 8nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 3/4 + Frame Gen Support | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+33.3%) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro RTX 4000 and GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile

Quadro RTX 4000
The Quadro RTX 4000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1005 MHz to 1545 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,925 points. Launch price was $899.

GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,938 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro RTX 4000 scores 14,925 and the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile reaches 14,938 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro RTX 4000 is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3,840 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile). Raw compute: 7.119 TFLOPS (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 10.94 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1545 MHz vs 1425 MHz. Ray tracing: 36 RT cores (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) with 288 Tensor cores vs 120.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,925 | 14,938 |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 3840+67% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.119 TFLOPS | 10.94 TFLOPS+54% |
| Boost Clock | 1545 MHz+8% | 1425 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+20% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 2.3 MB | 3.8 MB+65% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 36+20% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+140% | 120 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000 is support for DLSS 3 Frame Gen. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The Quadro RTX 4000 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 (including Frame Gen/Ray Reconstruction), whereas the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is capped at DLSS 2.0.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 3.5 | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | DLSS 3.0 (Native) | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | Yes (DLSS 3.5) | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro RTX 4000 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile has 6 GB. The Quadro RTX 4000 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 448 GB/s (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the Quadro RTX 4000. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile) — the Quadro RTX 4000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s+33% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7.0 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP10 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro RTX 4000) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP10 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro RTX 4000 draws 160W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile's 80W — a 66.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Quadro RTX 4000) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 241mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W | 80W-50% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 241mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 93.3 | 186.7+100% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2018).
| Feature | Quadro RTX 4000 | GeForce RTX 3060 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $220 | — |
| Codename | TU104 | GA106 |
| Release | November 13 2018 | January 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #154 | #214 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











