Quadro T1200 Mobile vs GRID M60-8A
Quadro T1200 Mobile
Popular choices:
GRID M60-8A
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is positioned at rank 30 and the GRID M60-8A is on rank 280, so the Quadro T1200 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1200 Mobile
Performance Per Dollar GRID M60-8A
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is significantly newer (2021 vs 2015). The Quadro T1200 Mobile likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GRID M60-8A lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID M60-8A is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Quadro T1200 Mobile.
| Insight | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the GRID M60-8A remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1200 Mobile and GRID M60-8A
Quadro T1200 Mobile
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.
GRID M60-8A
The GRID M60-8A is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 30 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 557 MHz to 1178 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,523 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro T1200 Mobile scores 5,500 and the GRID M60-8A reaches 5,523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the GRID M60-8A uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 2,048 (GRID M60-8A). Raw compute: 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 4.825 TFLOPS (GRID M60-8A). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 1178 MHz.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,500 | 5,523 |
| Architecture | Turing | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 2048+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.918 TFLOPS | 4.825 TFLOPS+65% |
| Boost Clock | 1425 MHz+21% | 1178 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 64+100% |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+33% | 0.75 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 2 MB (GRID M60-8A) — the GRID M60-8A has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB | 2 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro T1200 Mobile draws 18W versus the GRID M60-8A's 225W — a 170.4% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (GRID M60-8A). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 18W-92% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 1mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Perf/Watt | 305.6+1147% | 24.5 |
Value Analysis
The Quadro T1200 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | Quadro T1200 Mobile | GRID M60-8A |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2500 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $120 |
| Codename | TU117 | GM204 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 30 2015 |
| Ranking | #347 | #505 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Quadro T1200 Mobile and GRID M60-8A
