Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is positioned at rank 30 and the Radeon PRO W6300 is on rank 51, so the Quadro T1200 Mobile offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Quadro T1200 Mobile

#20

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

158%

#22

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

143%

#23

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

143%

#27

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

130%

#28

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

129%

#30

Quadro T1200 Mobile

MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A

100%

#35

GeForce GTX 960M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

98%

#37

UHD Graphics 730 (Rocket Lake)

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

96%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300

#23

Intel Arc Pro B60

MSRP: $500|Avg: $450

99%

#24

Radeon PRO W7600

MSRP: $599|Avg: $599

99%

#25

RTX 2000 Ada Generation

MSRP: $625|Avg: $750

99%

#26

Radeon Pro Vega 48

MSRP: $450|Avg: $450

90%

#27

Radeon Pro 5700 XT

MSRP: $500|Avg: $280

89%

#28

Quadro P5200

MSRP: $500|Avg: $240

84%

#36

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

531%

#51

Radeon PRO W6300

MSRP: $200|Avg: $150

100%

#52

Quadro K4100M

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $261

100%

#58

Quadro K2000M

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30

90%

#60

Intel Arc Pro A60

MSRP: $380|Avg: $380

90%

#63

T400 4GB

MSRP: $159|Avg: $99

86%

#64

Radeon Pro 5300

MSRP: $300|Avg: $150

85%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon PRO W6300 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro T1200 Mobile offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.1%)
Longevity	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)	RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	—

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon PRO W6300 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Quadro T1200 Mobile Benchmark Check

Radeon PRO W6300 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Quadro T1200 Mobile and Radeon PRO W6300

Quadro T1200 Mobile

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1200 Mobile scores 5,500 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,560+1%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.918 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1425 MHz	2040 MHz+43%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1200 Mobile comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The Quadro T1200 Mobile offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1200 Mobile draws 18W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 32.6% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.