Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅15.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).
✅Draws 18W instead of 25W, a 7W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 27.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $200 MSRP).

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1200 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌38.9% higher power demand at 25W vs 18W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T1200 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon PRO W6300 instead at 5,560 vs 5,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 12nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2021. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6300 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Quadro T1200 Mobile still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

Quadro T1200 Mobile vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro T1200 Mobile

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro T1200 Mobile scores 5,500 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is built on Turing while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 12 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1425 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,500	5,560+1%
Architecture	Turing	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	12 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1024+33%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.918 TFLOPS	3.133 TFLOPS+7%
Boost Clock	1425 MHz	2040 MHz+43%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	64+33%	48
L1 Cache	1 MB+300%	0.25 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro T1200 Mobile has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. Quadro T1200 Mobile gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the Quadro T1200 Mobile and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300.

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro T1200 Mobile draws 18W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 32.6% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	18W-28%	25W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Perf/Watt	305.6+37%	222.4

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2021).

Feature	Quadro T1200 Mobile	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	—	$200
Codename	TU117	Navi 24
Release	April 12 2021	January 19 2022
Ranking	#347	#413

Search Quadro T1200 Mobile on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.