GeForce GTX 680 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Quadro T1200 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌983.3% higher power demand at 195W vs 18W.

Quadro T1200 Mobile

2021

Why buy it

✅15.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GTX 680 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Quadro T1200 Mobile is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 18W instead of 195W, a 177W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Quadro T1200 Mobile is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 15.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 680 instead at 5,609 vs 5,500, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro T1200 Mobile is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 680 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 680 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro T1200 Mobile has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Quadro T1200 Mobile Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Quadro T1200 Mobile

The Quadro T1200 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 855 MHz to 1425 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 18W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,500 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Quadro T1200 Mobile reaches 5,500 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Quadro T1200 Mobile uses Turing, both on 28 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,024 (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2.918 TFLOPS (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1425 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Quadro T1200 Mobile
G3D Mark Score	5,609+2%	5,500
Architecture	Kepler	Turing
Process Node	28 nm	12 nm
Shading Units	1536+50%	1024
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS+11%	2.918 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1058 MHz	1425 MHz+35%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+100%	64
L1 Cache	0.13 MB	1 MB+669%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Quadro T1200 Mobile leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Quadro T1200 Mobile
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and 128-bit on the Quadro T1200 Mobile. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1 MB (Quadro T1200 Mobile) — the Quadro T1200 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Quadro T1200 Mobile
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Quadro T1200 Mobile's 18W — a 166.2% difference. The Quadro T1200 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Quadro T1200 Mobile). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Quadro T1200 Mobile
TDP	195W	18W-91%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	256mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	98°C	—
Perf/Watt	28.8	305.6+961%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Quadro T1200 Mobile (2021 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Quadro T1200 Mobile
MSRP	$499	—
Codename	GK104	TU117
Release	March 22 2012	April 12 2021
Ranking	#410	#347

Search GeForce GTX 680 on Amazon

Search Quadro T1200 Mobile on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.