GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro 5300M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro 5300M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro 5300M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

Why buy it

✅1.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌129.4% higher power demand at 195W vs 85W.

Radeon Pro 5300M

2019

Why buy it

✅GeForce GTX 680 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Pro 5300M is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 85W instead of 195W, a 110W reduction.
✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 680 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Older hardware, 4 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in newer AAA releases.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GTX 680 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon Pro 5300M instead at 5,853 vs 5,609, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro 5300M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2012. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GTX 680 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GTX 680 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon Pro 5300M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon Pro 5300M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro 5300M

The Radeon Pro 5300M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 13 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1250 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,853 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Radeon Pro 5300M reaches 5,853 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Pro 5300M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,280 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 3.2 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro 5300M). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1250 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
G3D Mark Score	5,609	5,853+4%
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	1536+20%	1280
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS+2%	3.2 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1058 MHz	1250 MHz+18%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+60%	80
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Pro 5300M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and 128-bit on the Radeon Pro 5300M. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2 MB (Radeon Pro 5300M) — the Radeon Pro 5300M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
VRAM Capacity	4 GB	4 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	2 MB+300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
DirectX	12 (FL 11_0)	12.1
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro 5300M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,H.265 (Radeon Pro 5300M).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
Encoder	NVENC 1st gen	VCN 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo VP5	VCN 2.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon Pro 5300M's 85W — a 78.6% difference. The Radeon Pro 5300M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon Pro 5300M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
TDP	195W	85W-56%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	256mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	98°C	—
Perf/Watt	28.8	68.9+139%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon Pro 5300M (2019 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon Pro 5300M
MSRP	$499	—
Codename	GK104	Navi 14
Release	March 22 2012	November 13 2019
Ranking	#410	#403

Search GeForce GTX 680 on Amazon

Search Radeon Pro 5300M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.