
GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6300
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon PRO W6300
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon PRO W6300 is significantly newer (2022 vs 2012). The Radeon PRO W6300 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce GTX 680 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (4 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon PRO W6300.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.9%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.9%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (256mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $150 for the Radeon PRO W6300, it costs 73% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 278.3% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+278.3%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon PRO W6300

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W6300
The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 2040 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 5,560 |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+100% | 768 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS+4% | 3.133 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 2040 MHz+93% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+167% | 48 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 256 KB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 680 comes with 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 has 2 GB. The GeForce GTX 680 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB+100% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 154.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 25W-87% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 256mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8 | 222.4+672% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 680 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 37.1 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 277.9% better value. The Radeon PRO W6300 is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon PRO W6300 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | $200-60% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 140.2+278% | 37.1 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 24 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | January 19 2022 |
| Ranking | #410 | #413 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















