GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO W6300

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO W6300 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO W6300: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GTX 680

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 2 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6300 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
149.5% HIGHER MSRP
$499 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.2 vs 27.8 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
❌680% higher power demand at 195W vs 25W.

Radeon PRO W6300

2022

Why buy it

✅0.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Costs $299 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 147.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.8 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
✅Draws 25W instead of 195W, a 170W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 2 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GTX 680 instead at 5,609 vs 5,560, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon PRO W6300 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 12 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2022 generation instead of 2012. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon PRO W6300 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $299 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $499, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 147.3% (27.8 vs 11.2), so the value case lines up with the gaming result.

GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon PRO W6300 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680

The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon PRO W6300

The Radeon PRO W6300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 19 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1512 MHz to 2040 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 12 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,560 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 and the Radeon PRO W6300 reaches 5,560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon PRO W6300 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 768 (Radeon PRO W6300). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 3.133 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6300). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 2040 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon PRO W6300
G3D Mark Score	5,609	5,560
Architecture	Kepler	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	1536+100%	768
Compute (TFLOPS)	3.25 TFLOPS+4%	3.133 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1058 MHz	2040 MHz+93%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	128+167%	48
L1 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon PRO W6300 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon PRO W6300
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 680 has 4 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon PRO W6300 carries 2 GB. GeForce GTX 680 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and 128-bit on the Radeon PRO W6300. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1 MB (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon PRO W6300
VRAM Capacity	4 GB+100%	2 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	0.5 MB	1 MB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon PRO W6300's 25W — a 154.5% difference. The Radeon PRO W6300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon PRO W6300). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon PRO W6300
TDP	195W	25W-87%
Recommended PSU	550W	350W-36%
Power Connector	2x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	256mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	—
Temp (Load)	98°C	—
Perf/Watt	28.8	222.4+672%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GTX 680 came in at $499, while the Radeon PRO W6300 launched at $200. On MSRP, Radeon PRO W6300 was 59.9% cheaper ($299 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 27.8 (Radeon PRO W6300) — the Radeon PRO W6300 offers 148.2% better value. The newer card here is Radeon PRO W6300 (2022 vs 2012).

Feature	GeForce GTX 680	Radeon PRO W6300
MSRP	$499	$200-60%
Performance per Dollar	11.2	27.8+148%
Codename	GK104	Navi 24
Release	March 22 2012	January 19 2022
Ranking	#410	#413

Search GeForce GTX 680 on Amazon

Search Radeon PRO W6300 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.