
GeForce GTX 680

GRID P40-4Q
GeForce GTX 680 vs GRID P40-4Q Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GTX 680 vs GRID P40-4Q FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
GeForce GTX 680 vs GRID P40-4Q: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GTX 680
2012Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,501 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 469% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.2 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $3,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 195W instead of 225W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌2012 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25500% longer card at 256mm vs 1mm.
GRID P40-4Q
2013Why buy it
- ✅Measures 1mm instead of 256mm, a 255mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
- ✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌2013 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌501.2% HIGHER MSRP$3,000 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 11.2 G3D/$ ($3,000 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ❌15.4% higher power demand at 225W vs 195W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GTX 680 vs GRID P40-4Q Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the GRID P40-4Q's 5,926 — the GRID P40-4Q leads by 5.7%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 5,926+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS+42% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 680 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The GRID P40-4Q leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 4 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is 256-bit on the GeForce GTX 680 and 128-bit on the GRID P40-4Q.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 256mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W-13% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 256mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8+10% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GTX 680 came in at $499, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000. On MSRP, GeForce GTX 680 was 83.4% cheaper ($2501 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 11.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2.0 (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 460% better value. The newer card here is GRID P40-4Q (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-83% | $3000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.2+460% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #410 | #628 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















