
GeForce GTX 680 vs GRID P40-4Q

GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

GRID P40-4Q
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GRID P40-4Q
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GRID P40-4Q is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 5.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 680.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-5.7%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+5.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (256mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 680 holds the technical lead. Priced at $40 (vs $150), it costs 73% less, resulting in a 254.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+254.9%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($150) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and GRID P40-4Q

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

GRID P40-4Q
The GRID P40-4Q is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 28 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 745 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,926 points. Launch price was $469.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the GRID P40-4Q's 5,926 — the GRID P40-4Q leads by 5.7%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the GRID P40-4Q uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,536 (GRID P40-4Q). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2.289 TFLOPS (GRID P40-4Q).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 5,926+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 1536 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS+42% | 2.289 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128 | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12_1 (GRID P40-4Q). Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12_1 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the GRID P40-4Q's 225W — a 14.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 680 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (GRID P40-4Q). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 256mm vs 1mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W-13% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 256mm | 1mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8+10% | 26.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 launched at $499 MSRP and currently averages $40, while the GRID P40-4Q launched at $3000 and now averages $150. The GeForce GTX 680 costs 73.3% less ($110 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 39.5 (GRID P40-4Q) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 254.9% better value. The GRID P40-4Q is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | GRID P40-4Q |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499-83% | $3000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-73% | $150 |
| Performance per Dollar | 140.2+255% | 39.5 |
| Codename | GK104 | GK104 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | June 28 2013 |
| Ranking | #410 | #628 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












