
GeForce GTX 680 vs Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce GTX 680
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5500M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 5500M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon RX 5500M is significantly newer (2019 vs 2012). The Radeon RX 5500M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 680 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 5500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 680.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (256mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GTX 680 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $100 for the Radeon RX 5500M, it costs 60% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 135.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+135.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($40) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 680 and Radeon RX 5500M

GeForce GTX 680
The GeForce GTX 680 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1006 MHz to 1058 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 195W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,609 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 5500M
The Radeon RX 5500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1375 MHz to 1645 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 85W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 5,954 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 680 scores 5,609 versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 5,954 — the Radeon RX 5500M leads by 6.2%. The GeForce GTX 680 is built on Kepler while the Radeon RX 5500M uses RDNA 1.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 1,408 (Radeon RX 5500M). Raw compute: 3.25 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 680) vs 4.632 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5500M). Boost clocks: 1058 MHz vs 1645 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 5,609 | 5,954+6% |
| Architecture | Kepler | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536+9% | 1408 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.25 TFLOPS | 4.632 TFLOPS+43% |
| Boost Clock | 1058 MHz | 1645 MHz+55% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 128+45% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) | FSR 2.1 |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 (Compatible) | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 4 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 192.2 GB/s (GeForce GTX 680) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon RX 5500M) — a 16.5% advantage for the Radeon RX 5500M. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (GeForce GTX 680) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 5500M) — the Radeon RX 5500M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 4 GB | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 192.2 GB/s | 224 GB/s+17% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 680) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5500M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (FL 11_0) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 1st gen (GeForce GTX 680) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5500M). Decoder: PureVideo VP5 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5500M).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 1st gen | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo VP5 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 680 draws 195W versus the Radeon RX 5500M's 85W — a 78.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce GTX 680) vs 350W (Radeon RX 5500M). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 256mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 98°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 195W | 85W-56% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 350W-36% |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 256mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 98°C | 75°C-23% |
| Perf/Watt | 28.8 | 70.0+143% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 680 costs 60% less ($60 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 140.2 (GeForce GTX 680) vs 59.5 (Radeon RX 5500M) — the GeForce GTX 680 offers 135.6% better value. The Radeon RX 5500M is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 680 | Radeon RX 5500M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $499 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $40-60% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 140.2+136% | 59.5 |
| Codename | GK104 | Navi 14 |
| Release | March 22 2012 | October 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #410 | #400 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















