Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU vs GeForce GTX 1650

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 1650 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2594.9% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2594.9%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2594.9%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	Turing (2018−2022) (12nm)
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the GeForce GTX 1650 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 1650 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU and GeForce GTX 1650

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

GeForce GTX 1650

The GeForce GTX 1650 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1485 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 7,869 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU scores 292 versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 7,869 — the GeForce GTX 1650 leads by 2594.9%.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
G3D Mark Score	292	7,869+2595%
Process Node	5 nm	12 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1650 has 4 GB. The GeForce GTX 1650 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	4 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	128 GB/s
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU draws 7W versus the GeForce GTX 1650's 75W — a 165.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) vs 300W (GeForce GTX 1650). Power connectors: Integrated vs None.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU	GeForce GTX 1650
TDP	7W-91%	75W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	300W
Power Connector	Integrated	None
Length	—	229mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	70°C
Perf/Watt	41.7	104.9+152%

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the GeForce GTX 1650 launched at $149 and now averages $75. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU costs 100+% less ($75 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) vs 104.9 (GeForce GTX 1650) — the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The GeForce GTX 1650 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).