
Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU vs Radeon R3

Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon R3
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R3
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R3 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 7.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-7.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+7.5%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon R3 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU and Radeon R3
Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.

Radeon R3
The Radeon R3 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 314 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU scores 292 versus the Radeon R3's 314 — the Radeon R3 leads by 7.5%.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 292 | 314+8% |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R3 has 512 MB. The Radeon R3 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon R3's 50W — a 150.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon R3). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-86% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 41.7+562% | 6.3 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Radeon R3 launched at $50 and now averages $50. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) vs 6.3 (Radeon R3) — the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon R3 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU | Radeon R3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 6.3 |
| Codename | — | Polaris 23 |
| Release | December 6 2018 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #860 | #757 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















