Intel UHD Graphics 600 vs Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 600
Popular choices:
Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Intel UHD Graphics 600 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 6.8% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU.
| Insight | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+6.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-6.8%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Generation 8.0 (2014−2015)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
Intel UHD Graphics 600
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2014. It features the Generation 8.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1050 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 312 points.
Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 292 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Intel UHD Graphics 600 scores 312 versus the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU's 292 — the Intel UHD Graphics 600 leads by 6.8%.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 312+7% | 292 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 0 MB of Shared. Bus width: System vs System.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | System |
Power & Dimensions
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 draws 15W versus the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU's 7W — a 72.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU). Power connectors: Integrated vs Integrated.
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W | 7W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 1W | 1W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | Integrated |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 55°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 20.8 | 41.7+100% |
Value Analysis
The Intel UHD Graphics 600 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU launched at $0 and now averages $0. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Intel UHD Graphics 600) vs Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU) — the Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU offers NaN% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).
| Feature | Intel UHD Graphics 600 | Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | $0 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0 | $0 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | Infinity |
| Codename | Broadwell GT2 | — |
| Release | September 5 2014 | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #703 | #860 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Intel UHD Graphics 600 and Qualcomm Adreno 630 GPU
