Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU vs FirePro 3D V5700

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar FirePro 3D V5700

#339

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

16234%

#354

Quadro FX 580

MSRP: $199|Avg: $500

100%

#355

FirePro 3D V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $25

100%

#357

GRID M60-1B

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $120

99%

#358

FireStream 9270

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $20

98%

#359

Quadro 400

MSRP: $169|Avg: $500

97%

#360

FirePro 2260

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

97%

#361

Quadro FX 380 LP

MSRP: $169|Avg: $15

95%

#363

Quadro FX 1800

MSRP: $489|Avg: $100

89%

#364

FirePro 3D V8700

MSRP: $1499|Avg: $1229

88%

#365

FirePro 3D V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $80

88%

#366

Quadro 5000

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $100

87%

#367

FirePro V5700

MSRP: $599|Avg: $20

86%

#368

FirePro V9800

MSRP: $3499|Avg: $250

86%

#369

FirePro 3D V8750

MSRP: $1799|Avg: $500

78%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The FirePro 3D V5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The FirePro 3D V5700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.3% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (512 MB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU	FirePro 3D V5700
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.3%)	✅Leading raw performance (+1.3%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

While current pricing data is unavailable, the FirePro 3D V5700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU Benchmark Check

FirePro 3D V5700 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU and FirePro 3D V5700

Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.

FirePro 3D V5700

The FirePro 3D V5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 18 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 274W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 547 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU scores 540 and the FirePro 3D V5700 reaches 547 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU	FirePro 3D V5700
G3D Mark Score	540	547+1%
Process Node	7 nm	28 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU	FirePro 3D V5700
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the FirePro 3D V5700 has 512 MB. The FirePro 3D V5700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU	FirePro 3D V5700
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Bus Width	System	64-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU draws 7W versus the FirePro 3D V5700's 274W — a 190% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) vs 350W (FirePro 3D V5700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU	FirePro 3D V5700
TDP	7W-97%	274W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	350W
Power Connector	Integrated	PCIe-powered
Length	—	170mm
Height	—	112mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	77.1+3755%	2.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the FirePro 3D V5700 launched at $599 and now averages $25. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) vs 21.9 (FirePro 3D V5700) — the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2014).