Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU vs Quadro FX 2700
Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
Popular choices:
Quadro FX 2700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Quadro FX 2700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 2008). The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Quadro FX 2700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro FX 2700 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.6% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.6%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro FX 2700 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU and Quadro FX 2700
Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 540 points.
Quadro FX 2700
The Quadro FX 2700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 543 points. Launch price was $3,499.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU scores 540 and the Quadro FX 2700 reaches 543 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 540 | 543 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 55 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro FX 2700 has 4 GB. The Quadro FX 2700 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU draws 7W versus the Quadro FX 2700's 189W — a 185.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) vs 350W (Quadro FX 2700). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-96% | 189W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 77.1+2559% | 2.9 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $0, while the Quadro FX 2700 launched at $100 and now averages $50. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU costs 100+% less ($50 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU) vs 10.9 (Quadro FX 2700) — the Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU offers Infinity% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2008).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU | Quadro FX 2700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 10.9 |
| Codename | — | GT200B |
| Release | December 6 2018 | November 11 2008 |
| Ranking | #916 | #815 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Qualcomm Adreno 675 GPU and Quadro FX 2700
