Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 vs GeForce GTX 460 SE

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is positioned at rank #572 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

#562

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

3341%

#564

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

3028%

#565

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

3020%

#569

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

2746%

#570

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

2728%

#572

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

MSRP: $599|Avg: $300

100%

#573

GeForce 9400 GT

MSRP: $59|Avg: $20

100%

#574

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

99%

#575

GeForce 240M GT

MSRP: $100|Avg: $5

98%

#576

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#577

GeForce 310

MSRP: $45|Avg: $5

98%

#578

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

98%

#579

Radeon R5 M320

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

98%

#580

GeForce 9600 GT

MSRP: $149|Avg: $20

98%

#581

Radeon HD 7620G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $140|Avg: $30

97%

#582

Radeon HD 8650G + 8600M Dual

MSRP: $200|Avg: $50

94%

#583

Mobility Radeon HD 4570

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

94%

#584

Radeon Vega 10

MSRP: $499|Avg: $100

94%

#585

Radeon HD 8450G + HD 8600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

93%

#586

Radeon R7 M440

MSRP: $300|Avg: $300

92%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is significantly newer (2018 vs 2010). The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 460 SE lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (1 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Performance	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%)	✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+100+%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $50 versus $300 for the Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3, it costs 83% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 512.6% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+512.6%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300)	✅More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 SE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

Counter-Strike 2

No prediction data available

League of Legends

League of Legends

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Valorant

No prediction data available

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 and GeForce GTX 460 SE

Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,947 points.

GeForce GTX 460 SE

The GeForce GTX 460 SE is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 15 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 650 MHz. It has 288 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,988 points. Launch price was $160.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 scores 1,947 and the GeForce GTX 460 SE reaches 1,988 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
G3D Mark Score	1,947	1,988+2%
Process Node	7 nm	40 nm

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
VRAM Capacity	Shared System RAM	1 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 draws 7W versus the GeForce GTX 460 SE's 150W — a 182.2% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 SE). Power connectors: Integrated vs 2x 6-pin.

Feature	Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3	GeForce GTX 460 SE
TDP	7W-95%	150W
Recommended PSU	1W-100%	450W
Power Connector	Integrated	2x 6-pin
Length	—	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	—	2
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	278.1+1991%	13.3

💰

Value Analysis

The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 launched at $599 MSRP and currently averages $300, while the GeForce GTX 460 SE launched at $160 and now averages $50. The GeForce GTX 460 SE costs 83.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 6.5 (Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3) vs 39.8 (GeForce GTX 460 SE) — the GeForce GTX 460 SE offers 512.3% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno 8cx Gen 3 is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2010).