
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU vs Radeon Pro WX 4130

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is positioned at rank 635 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 is on rank 186, so the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU uses modern memory architecture. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (4 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $400 for the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU, it costs 75% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 300.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+300.8%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU and Radeon Pro WX 4130
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,886 points.

Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU scores 1,886 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,886 | 1,890 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 4 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU draws 7W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 150.9% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: Integrated vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 7W-86% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 1W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | Integrated | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 269.4+613% | 37.8 |
Value Analysis
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU launched at $899 MSRP and currently averages $400, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 costs 75% less ($300 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 4.7 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) vs 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 302.1% better value. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2017).
| Feature | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $899 | $300-67% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $400 | $100-75% |
| Performance per Dollar | 4.7 | 18.9+302% |
| Codename | — | Baffin |
| Release | December 6 2018 | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #916 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















