
Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU

Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:

Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Per Dollar Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Moore Threads MTT S70 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.3%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.3%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / Legacy) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Moore Threads MTT S70 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $140 versus $400 for the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU, it costs 65% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 184.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+184.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($140) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($400) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S70 and Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU
The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is manufactured by Qualcomm. It was released in December 6 2018. The thermal design power (TDP) is 7W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,886 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU reaches 1,886 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,886 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU has 0 MB. The Moore Threads MTT S70 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU's 7W — a 187.7% difference. The Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1W (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 7W-97% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 269.4+3069% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 MSRP and currently averages $140, while the Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU launched at $899 and now averages $400. The Moore Threads MTT S70 costs 65% less ($260 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 4.7 (Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 offers 185.1% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Qualcomm Adreno X1-45 GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345-62% | $899 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140-65% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4+185% | 4.7 |
| Codename | Chunxiao | — |
| Release | sem dados | December 6 2018 |
| Ranking | #694 | #916 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.


















