Chipversus Index
Jump to Section

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

CPUCPUGPUGPU

Moore Threads MTT S70

Core: 1600 MHz
Buy on Amazon
VS
AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017Core: 925 MHzBoost: 1219 MHz
Buy on Amazon

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Performance Spectrum

Moore Threads MTT S70
0.5 GB 220
1,880
+0.5%
brand logoRadeon HD 8750M
brand logoGeForce 930A
brand logoGeForce GTX 660M
brand logoRadeon R7 M380
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB
Radeon Pro WX 2100
2 GB 35
1,871
0.0%
brand logoRadeon HD 6750
brand logoRadeon HD 8670D + HD 6670 Dual
brand logoRadeon R7 M370
brand logoRadeon RX Vega 9
brand logoRadeon RX 6300M
brand logoRadeon RX 7600M
brand logoRadeon RX 7700S
brand logoRadeon RX 9060 XT 16GB

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

  • ✅Radeon Pro WX 2100 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S70 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    131.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $345 MSRPvs$149 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 12.6 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
  • ❌528.6% higher power demand at 220W vs 35W.

Radeon Pro WX 2100

2017

Why buy it

  • ✅Costs $196 less on MSRP ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • ✅Delivers 130.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 12.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • ✅Draws 35W instead of 220W, a 185W reduction.
  • ✅Measures 168mm instead of 285mm, a 117mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Moore Threads MTT S70 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 0.5% in PassMark G3D (1,880 vs 1,871), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Moore Threads MTT S70 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Pro WX 2100 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $196 cheaper on MSRP at $149 vs $345, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 130.4% (12.6 vs 5.4), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon Pro WX 2100 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Moore Threads MTT S70 has the stronger long-term case.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Moore Threads MTT S70

The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

AMD

Radeon Pro WX 2100

The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
G3D Mark Score
1,880
1,871
Architecture
MUSA
GCN 4.0
Process Node
12 nm
14 nm
Shading Units
3584+600%
512
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.47 TFLOPS+819%
1.248 TFLOPS
ROPs
224+1300%
16
TMUs
224+600%
32
L2 Cache
3.5 MB+1300%
0.25 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 carries 2 GB. Radeon Pro WX 2100 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70 and 64-bit on the Radeon Pro WX 2100. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
3.5 MB+1300%
0.25 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
Max Displays
4+33%
3
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
Encoder
MUSA Gen2
VCE 3.4 (Polaris)
Decoder
MUSA Gen2
UVD 6.3
Codecs
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
TDP
220W
35W-84%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
168mm
Height
112mm
69mm
Slots
2
1-50%
Temp (Load)
—
80°C
Perf/Watt
8.5
53.5+529%
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S70 came in at $345, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon Pro WX 2100 was 56.8% cheaper ($196 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 12.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 133.3% better value.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Radeon Pro WX 2100
MSRP
$345
$149-57%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
12.6+133%
Codename
Chunxiao
Lexa
Release
sem dados
June 4 2017
Ranking
#694
#702
Search Moore Threads MTT S70 on AmazonSearch Radeon Pro WX 2100 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.