Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 2100
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The Radeon Pro WX 2100 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $45 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 68% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 209.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+209.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) | ✅More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S70 and Radeon Pro WX 2100
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Radeon Pro WX 2100
The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 925 MHz to 1219 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,871 points. Launch price was $149.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 2100 reaches 1,871 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 512 (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1.248 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,871 |
| Architecture | MUSA | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+600% | 512 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+819% | 1.248 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 224+1300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 224+600% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 has 2 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+1300% | 0.25 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs VCE 3.4 (Polaris) (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 2100).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | VCE 3.4 (Polaris) |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro WX 2100's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 2100). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 285mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | 168mm |
| Height | 112mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 53.5+529% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 MSRP and currently averages $140, while the Radeon Pro WX 2100 launched at $149 and now averages $45. The Radeon Pro WX 2100 costs 67.9% less ($95 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 41.6 (Radeon Pro WX 2100) — the Radeon Pro WX 2100 offers 210.4% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345 | $149-57% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140 | $45-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | 41.6+210% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Lexa |
| Release | sem dados | June 4 2017 |
| Ranking | #694 | #702 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S70 and Radeon Pro WX 2100
