Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon Pro WX 4130
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro WX 4130
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro WX 4130
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is significantly newer (2017 vs 0). The Radeon Pro WX 4130 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.5% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (4 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Moore Threads MTT S70.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.5%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.5%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / GCN 4.0 (2016−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $100 versus $140 for the Moore Threads MTT S70, it costs 29% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 40.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($140) | ✅More affordable ($100) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S70 and Radeon Pro WX 4130
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.
Radeon Pro WX 4130
The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 1 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1002 MHz to 1053 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,890 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Radeon Pro WX 4130 reaches 1,890 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 uses GCN 4.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 640 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1.348 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,890 |
| Architecture | MUSA | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+460% | 640 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+751% | 1.348 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 224+1300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 224+460% | 40 |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 has 4 GB. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1 MB (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
Display & API Support
Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: MUSA Gen2 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs VCE 3.4 (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Decoder: MUSA Gen2 vs UVD 6.3. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs H.264,HEVC (Radeon Pro WX 4130).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | MUSA Gen2 | VCE 3.4 |
| Decoder | MUSA Gen2 | UVD 6.3 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 | H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Radeon Pro WX 4130's 50W — a 125.9% difference. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (Radeon Pro WX 4130). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 50W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 37.8+345% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 MSRP and currently averages $140, while the Radeon Pro WX 4130 launched at $300 and now averages $100. The Radeon Pro WX 4130 costs 28.6% less ($40 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 18.9 (Radeon Pro WX 4130) — the Radeon Pro WX 4130 offers 41% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Radeon Pro WX 4130 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345 | $300-13% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140 | $100-29% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | 18.9+41% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Baffin |
| Release | sem dados | March 1 2017 |
| Ranking | #694 | #697 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Moore Threads MTT S70 and Radeon Pro WX 4130
