
Moore Threads MTT S70
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX Vega 11
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Moore Threads MTT S70
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is significantly newer (2018 vs 0). The RadeonT RX Vega 11 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Moore Threads MTT S70 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2%) |
| Longevity | MUSA (12nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2018 / GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (285mm) | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RadeonT RX Vega 11 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Moore Threads MTT S70 and RadeonT RX Vega 11
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

RadeonT RX Vega 11
The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 10 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1251 MHz. It has 704 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,917 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the RadeonT RX Vega 11 reaches 1,917 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 704 (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX Vega 11).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,917+2% |
| Architecture | MUSA | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+409% | 704 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+551% | 1.761 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 224+2700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 224+409% | 44 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 has 0 MB. The Moore Threads MTT S70 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the RadeonT RX Vega 11's 35W — a 145.1% difference. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1W (RadeonT RX Vega 11). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs Integrated.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 35W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | Integrated |
| Length | 285mm | — |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 54.8+545% |
Value Analysis
The Moore Threads MTT S70 launched at $345 MSRP and currently averages $140, while the RadeonT RX Vega 11 launched at $0 and now averages $0. The RadeonT RX Vega 11 costs 100+% less ($140 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 13.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs Infinity (RadeonT RX Vega 11) — the RadeonT RX Vega 11 offers Infinity% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | RadeonT RX Vega 11 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345 | $0-100% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $140 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 13.4 | Infinity |
| Codename | Chunxiao | Raven |
| Release | sem dados | May 10 2018 |
| Ranking | #694 | #673 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















