Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

✅Radeon HD 7700-serie is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S70 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌
117% HIGHER MSRP
$345 MSRPvs$159 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 11.9 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $159 MSRP).

Radeon HD 7700-serie

2012

Why buy it

✅Costs $186 less on MSRP ($159 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
✅Delivers 119.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 11.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($159 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7700-serie is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1% in PassMark G3D (1,899 vs 1,880), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Moore Threads MTT S70 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon HD 7700-serie makes the most sense to buy today. It is $186 cheaper on MSRP at $159 vs $345, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 119.2% (11.9 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 7700-serie is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Moore Threads MTT S70 has the stronger long-term case.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Radeon HD 7700-serie Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Moore Threads MTT S70

The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

Radeon HD 7700-serie

The Radeon HD 7700-serie is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 9 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,899 points. Launch price was $549.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Radeon HD 7700-serie reaches 1,899 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Radeon HD 7700-serie uses GCN 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 2,048 (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 3.789 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7700-serie).

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S70	Radeon HD 7700-serie
G3D Mark Score	1,880	1,899+1%
Architecture	MUSA	GCN 1.0
Process Node	12 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	3584+75%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	11.47 TFLOPS+203%	3.789 TFLOPS
ROPs	224+600%	32
TMUs	224+75%	128
L2 Cache	3.5 MB+367%	0.75 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S70	Radeon HD 7700-serie
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70 and 128-bit on the Radeon HD 7700-serie. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.75 MB (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S70	Radeon HD 7700-serie
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	3.5 MB+367%	0.75 MB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Radeon HD 7700-serie's 250W — a 12.8% difference. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 450W (Radeon HD 7700-serie). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs 1x 6-pin.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S70	Radeon HD 7700-serie
TDP	220W-12%	250W
Recommended PSU	600W	450W-25%
Power Connector	1x 8-pin	1x 6-pin
Length	285mm	—
Height	112mm	—
Slots	2	—
Perf/Watt	8.5+12%	7.6

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S70 came in at $345, while the Radeon HD 7700-serie launched at $159. On MSRP, Radeon HD 7700-serie was 53.9% cheaper ($186 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 11.9 (Radeon HD 7700-serie) — the Radeon HD 7700-serie offers 120.4% better value.

Feature	Moore Threads MTT S70	Radeon HD 7700-serie
MSRP	$345	$159-54%
Performance per Dollar	5.4	11.9+120%
Codename	Chunxiao	Tahiti
Release	sem dados	January 9 2012
Ranking	#694	#431

Search Moore Threads MTT S70 on Amazon

Search Radeon HD 7700-serie on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.