
Moore Threads MTT S70

Quadro M520
Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends
Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Moore Threads MTT S70
Why buy it
- β Quadro M520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S70 is the less risky modern option long term.
Trade-offs
- βLess VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- βOlder hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
- β72.5% HIGHER MSRP$345 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
- βLower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
- β780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.
Quadro M520
2017Why buy it
- β Costs $145 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
- β Delivers 75.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
- β 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
- β Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- β2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Moore Threads MTT S70
The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

Quadro M520
The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.
Graphics Performance
The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Quadro M520 reaches 1,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark β just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520).
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,880 | 1,913+2% |
| Architecture | MUSA | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584+833% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 11.47 TFLOPS+1335% | 0.7995 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 224+2700% | 8 |
| TMUs | 224+1300% | 16 |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 carries 2 GB. Quadro M520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70 and 64-bit on the Quadro M520. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1 MB (Quadro M520) β the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 2 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3.5 MB+250% | 1 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Quadro M520's 25W β a 159.2% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 220W | 25W-89% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 350W-42% |
| Power Connector | 1x 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 285mm | β |
| Height | 112mm | β |
| Slots | 2 | β |
| Perf/Watt | 8.5 | 76.5+800% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S70 came in at $345, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200. On MSRP, Quadro M520 was 42% cheaper ($145 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 9.6 (Quadro M520) β the Quadro M520 offers 77.8% better value.
| Feature | Moore Threads MTT S70 | Quadro M520 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $345 | $200-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 9.6+78% |
| Codename | Chunxiao | GM108 |
| Release | sem dados | January 11 2017 |
| Ranking | #694 | #695 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















