Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520

Moore Threads MTT S70

Core: 1600 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

Quadro M520

2017Core: 1041 MHzBoost: 1019 MHz

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Moore Threads MTT S70

Why buy it

  • βœ…Quadro M520 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Moore Threads MTT S70 is the less risky modern option long term.

Trade-offs

  • ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • ❌Older hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
  • ❌
    72.5% HIGHER MSRP
    $345 MSRPvs$200 MSRP
  • ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 9.6 G3D/$ ($345 MSRP vs $200 MSRP).
  • ❌780% higher power demand at 220W vs 25W.

Quadro M520

2017

Why buy it

  • βœ…Costs $145 less on MSRP ($200 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • βœ…Delivers 75.5% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 9.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($200 MSRP vs $345 MSRP).
  • βœ…300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).
  • βœ…Draws 25W instead of 220W, a 195W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • ❌2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Quadro M520 is the faster gaming card right now based on the synthetic data we have. It leads by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (1,913 vs 1,880), which is the best performance signal available in this matchup.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Moore Threads MTT S70 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 12nm process instead of 28nm. That still leaves it as the safer long-term option on hardware alone.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro M520 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $145 cheaper on MSRP at $200 vs $345, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 75.5% (9.6 vs 5.4), so the value case lines up with the gaming result. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Quadro M520 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Moore Threads MTT S70 has the stronger long-term case.

Moore Threads MTT S70 vs Quadro M520 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Moore Threads MTT S70

The Moore Threads MTT S70 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in sem dados. It features the MUSA architecture. The core clock speed is 1600 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,880 points.

NVIDIA

Quadro M520

The Quadro M520 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 11 2017. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1041 MHz to 1019 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 25W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,913 points.

⚑

Graphics Performance

The Moore Threads MTT S70 scores 1,880 and the Quadro M520 reaches 1,913 in the G3D Mark benchmark β€” just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Moore Threads MTT S70 is built on MUSA while the Quadro M520 uses Maxwell, both on 12 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 384 (Quadro M520). Raw compute: 11.47 TFLOPS (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 0.7995 TFLOPS (Quadro M520).

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Quadro M520
G3D Mark Score
1,880
1,913+2%
Architecture
MUSA
Maxwell
Process Node
12 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
3584+833%
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
11.47 TFLOPS+1335%
0.7995 TFLOPS
ROPs
224+2700%
8
TMUs
224+1300%
16
L2 Cache
3.5 MB+250%
1 MB
✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Quadro M520
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
πŸ’Ύ

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Moore Threads MTT S70 has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro M520 carries 2 GB. Quadro M520 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Moore Threads MTT S70 and 64-bit on the Quadro M520. L2 Cache: 3.5 MB (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 1 MB (Quadro M520) β€” the Moore Threads MTT S70 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Quadro M520
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
64-bit
L2 Cache
3.5 MB+250%
1 MB
πŸ”Œ

Power & Dimensions

The Moore Threads MTT S70 draws 220W versus the Quadro M520's 25W β€” a 159.2% difference. The Quadro M520 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 350W (Quadro M520). Power connectors: 1x 8-pin vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Quadro M520
TDP
220W
25W-89%
Recommended PSU
600W
350W-42%
Power Connector
1x 8-pin
PCIe-powered
Length
285mm
β€”
Height
112mm
β€”
Slots
2
β€”
Perf/Watt
8.5
76.5+800%
πŸ’°

Value Analysis

At launch, the Moore Threads MTT S70 came in at $345, while the Quadro M520 launched at $200. On MSRP, Quadro M520 was 42% cheaper ($145 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (Moore Threads MTT S70) vs 9.6 (Quadro M520) β€” the Quadro M520 offers 77.8% better value.

FeatureMoore Threads MTT S70Quadro M520
MSRP
$345
$200-42%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
9.6+78%
Codename
Chunxiao
GM108
Release
sem dados
January 11 2017
Ranking
#694
#695

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.