
Radeon 3020e vs GeForce 9800M GS

Radeon 3020e
Popular choices:

GeForce 9800M GS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9800M GS
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3020e is significantly newer (2019 vs 2008). The Radeon 3020e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce 9800M GS lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The GeForce 9800M GS is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.4% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon 3020e.
| Insight | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce 9800M GS offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $50 (vs $49), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 0.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon 3020e.
| Insight | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+0.3%) |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3020e and GeForce 9800M GS

Radeon 3020e
The Radeon 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.

GeForce 9800M GS
The GeForce 9800M GS is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 517 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3020e scores 505 and the GeForce 9800M GS reaches 517 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3020e is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce 9800M GS uses G9x, both on 14 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3020e) vs 224 (GeForce 9800M GS).
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 505 | 517+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+129% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3020e) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce 9800M GS). OpenGL: 4.6 vs 3.3. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+8% | 11.1 (10_0) |
| OpenGL | 4.6+39% | 3.3 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs PureVideo HD (VP3). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon 3020e) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce 9800M GS).
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | — |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | PureVideo HD (VP3) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3020e draws 50W versus the GeForce 9800M GS's 150W — a 100% difference. The Radeon 3020e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3020e) vs 350W (GeForce 9800M GS). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-67% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 10.1+197% | 3.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3020e launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 9800M GS launched at $200 and now averages $50. The Radeon 3020e costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Radeon 3020e) vs 10.3 (GeForce 9800M GS) — the GeForce 9800M GS offers 0% better value. The Radeon 3020e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | GeForce 9800M GS |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $200 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3 | 10.3 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | May 13 2019 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #757 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.











