
Radeon 3020e
Popular choices:

Radeon R5 M420
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 M420
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 3020e uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon 3020e likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R5 M420 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 3020e is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon R5 M420.
| Insight | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.2%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 2.0 (2013−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 3020e offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $49 versus $300 for the Radeon R5 M420, it costs 84% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 513.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+513.5%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($300) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 3020e and Radeon R5 M420

Radeon 3020e
The Radeon 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.

Radeon R5 M420
The Radeon R5 M420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 3020e scores 505 and the Radeon R5 M420 reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3020e is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R5 M420 uses GCN 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3020e) vs 768 (Radeon R5 M420). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3020e) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M420). Boost clocks: 1218 MHz vs 1000 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 505 | 504 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | GCN 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512 | 768+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS | 1.536 TFLOPS+23% |
| Boost Clock | 1218 MHz+22% | 1000 MHz |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 48+50% |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB | 192 KB+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon 3020e) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3020e) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 M420). Vulkan: 1.2 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3+50% | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3020e) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M420). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon 3020e) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 M420).
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 3020e draws 50W versus the Radeon R5 M420's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 3020e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3020e) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M420). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-33% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.1+51% | 6.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 3020e launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the Radeon R5 M420 launched at $300 and now averages $300. The Radeon 3020e costs 83.7% less ($251 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 10.3 (Radeon 3020e) vs 1.7 (Radeon R5 M420) — the Radeon 3020e offers 505.9% better value. The Radeon 3020e is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | Radeon 3020e | Radeon R5 M420 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $300 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-84% | $300 |
| Performance per Dollar | 10.3+506% | 1.7 |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | Emerald |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 15 2016 |
| Ranking | #757 | #649 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















