
GeForce GT 425M

Radeon 3020e
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon 3020e Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon 3020e FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon 3020e: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 425M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon 3020e across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Radeon 3020e
2019Why buy it
- ✅33.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GT 425M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3020e is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon 3020e Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 425M
The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Radeon 3020e
The Radeon 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 425M scores 499 and the Radeon 3020e reaches 505 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 425M is built on Kepler while the Radeon 3020e uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 512 (Radeon 3020e). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M) vs 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon 3020e).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499 | 505+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 512+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.247 TFLOPS+196% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 425M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon 3020e leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 425M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon 3020e carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 425M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M and 64-bit on the Radeon 3020e. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 425M) vs 512 KB (Radeon 3020e) — the Radeon 3020e has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3020e). Vulkan: None vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 425M) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3020e). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon 3020e).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 425M draws 45W versus the Radeon 3020e's 50W — a 10.5% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 425M) vs 350W (Radeon 3020e). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-10% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.1+10% | 10.1 |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon 3020e (2019 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon 3020e |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Polaris 23 |
| Release | April 1 2013 | May 13 2019 |
| Ranking | #857 | #757 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














