GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon R5 M315

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon R5 M315 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon R5 M315: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 425M

2013

Why buy it

✅1.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $150 MSRP).

Radeon R5 M315

2016

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($150 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 425M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 425M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 1.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2% in PassMark G3D (499 vs 489), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 425M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M315 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M315 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, GeForce GT 425M has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon R5 M315 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 425M

The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Radeon R5 M315

The Radeon R5 M315 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 780 MHz to 1030 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 425M scores 499 and the Radeon R5 M315 reaches 489 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 425M is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M315 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M315). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M) vs 0.6592 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M315).

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	Radeon R5 M315
G3D Mark Score	499+2%	489
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384+20%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.4216 TFLOPS	0.6592 TFLOPS+56%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+60%	20
L1 Cache	32 KB	80 KB+150%
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 425M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M315 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	Radeon R5 M315
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 425M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M315 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 425M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M315. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 425M) vs 128 KB (Radeon R5 M315) — the GeForce GT 425M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	Radeon R5 M315
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB+100%	128 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 425M draws 45W versus the Radeon R5 M315's 75W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 425M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M315). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	Radeon R5 M315
TDP	45W-40%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	0mm	—
Height	0mm	—
Slots	0	—
Temp (Load)	75°C	—
Perf/Watt	11.1+71%	6.5

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M315 (2016 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 425M	Radeon R5 M315
MSRP	—	$150
Codename	GK107	Jet
Release	April 1 2013	May 15 2016
Ranking	#857	#922

Search GeForce GT 425M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M315 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.