GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon HD 8650G
GeForce GT 425M
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 8650G
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The GeForce GT 425M is positioned at rank 159 and the Radeon HD 8650G is on rank 125, so the Radeon HD 8650G offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 425M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8650G
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8650G is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 0.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 425M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-0.4%) | ✅Leading raw performance (+0.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 425M offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GT 425M holds the technical lead. Priced at $25 (vs $50), it costs 50% less, resulting in a 99.2% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+99.2%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($25) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GT 425M and Radeon HD 8650G
GeForce GT 425M
The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
Radeon HD 8650G
The Radeon HD 8650G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 501 points. Launch price was $249.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 425M scores 499 and the Radeon HD 8650G reaches 501 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 425M is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD 8650G uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 1,024 (Radeon HD 8650G). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M) vs 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8650G).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499 | 501 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 1024+167% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.761 TFLOPS+318% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 32 | 64+100% |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 256 KB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 425M comes with 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 8650G has 512 MB. The GeForce GT 425M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 425M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 8650G) — the Radeon HD 8650G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 425M draws 45W versus the Radeon HD 8650G's 130W — a 97.1% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 425M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 8650G). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W-65% | 130W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | 0mm | — |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 11.1+185% | 3.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GT 425M costs 50% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 20.0 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 10.0 (Radeon HD 8650G) — the GeForce GT 425M offers 100% better value. The GeForce GT 425M is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon HD 8650G |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $50 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $25-50% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 20.0+100% | 10.0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Pitcairn |
| Release | April 1 2013 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #857 | #503 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on GeForce GT 425M and Radeon HD 8650G
