GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 425M

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX+

2008Core: 500 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GT 425M

2013Core: 549 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 425M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 425M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 425M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9800 GTX+

2008

Why buy it

  • 65.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

GeForce GT 425M

2013

Why buy it

  • Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800 GTX+ across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 65.7% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 425M instead at 499 vs 489, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce 9800 GTX+ makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 425M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce 9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 425M

The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ scores 489 and the GeForce GT 425M reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 425M uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 384 (GeForce GT 425M).

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
G3D Mark Score
489
499+2%
Architecture
G9x
Kepler
Process Node
65 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
224
384+71%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 GTX+ and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M.

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
DirectX
10.0
11.0+10%
Vulkan
None
None
OpenGL
3.3
4.0+21%
Max Displays
2+100%
1
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs No (GeForce GT 425M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M).

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
Encoder
No
No
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP2
PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264
MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 425M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 350W (GeForce GT 425M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 75°C.

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
TDP
150W
45W-70%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
0mm
Height
111mm
0mm
Slots
2
0-100%
Temp (Load)
100°C
75°C-25%
Perf/Watt
3.3
11.1+236%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 425M (2013 vs 2008).

FeatureGeForce 9800 GTX+GeForce GT 425M
MSRP
$229
Codename
NB9E-GTX
GK107
Release
July 15 2008
April 1 2013
Ranking
#825
#857

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.