GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 625M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 625M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 625M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce 9800 GTX+

2008

Why buy it

✅67.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 2.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌233.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 45W.

GeForce GT 625M

2012

Why buy it

✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 1 GB).
✅Draws 45W instead of 150W, a 105W reduction.
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce 9800 GTX+ across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2012 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 2.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $229 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 67.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (489 vs 485), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce 9800 GTX+ is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce 9800 GTX+ makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce 9800 GTX+ vs GeForce GT 625M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce 9800 GTX+

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 489 points.

GeForce GT 625M

The GeForce GT 625M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 22 2012. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from Up to 900 MHz to 950 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 485 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ scores 489 and the GeForce GT 625M reaches 485 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce 9800 GTX+ is built on G9x while the GeForce GT 625M uses Kepler, both on 65 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 224 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 384 (GeForce GT 625M).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
G3D Mark Score	489	485
Architecture	G9x	Kepler
Process Node	65 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	224	384+71%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ has 1 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 625M carries 2 GB. GeForce GT 625M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the GeForce 9800 GTX+ and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 625M.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	2 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.0 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 625M). Vulkan: None vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
DirectX	10.0	11.0+10%
Vulkan	None	None
OpenGL	3.3	4.0+21%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: No (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs No (GeForce GT 625M). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP2 vs PureVideo HD VP5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264 (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 625M).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
Encoder	No	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP2	PureVideo HD VP5
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce 9800 GTX+ draws 150W versus the GeForce GT 625M's 45W — a 107.7% difference. The GeForce GT 625M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce 9800 GTX+) vs 350W (GeForce GT 625M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 100°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
TDP	150W	45W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	100°C	75°C-25%
Perf/Watt	3.3	10.8+227%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 625M (2012 vs 2008).

Feature	GeForce 9800 GTX+	GeForce GT 625M
MSRP	$229	—
Codename	NB9E-GTX	GK107
Release	July 15 2008	March 22 2012
Ranking	#825	#828

Search GeForce 9800 GTX+ on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 625M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.