GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GT 425M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GT 425M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GT 425M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

✅0.9% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌42.2% higher power demand at 64W vs 45W.

GeForce GT 425M

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 64W, a 19W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GT 240 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

GeForce GT 240 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 0.9% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 425M instead at 499 vs 495, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a newer 2014 generation instead of 2013. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GT 425M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

GeForce GT 425M

The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the GeForce GT 425M reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GT 425M uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 384 (GeForce GT 425M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
G3D Mark Score	495	499
Architecture	Kepler	Kepler
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS+81%	0.4216 TFLOPS
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	32
L1 Cache	32 KB	32 KB
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M). Vulkan: N/A vs None. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 1.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
DirectX	10.1	11.0+9%
Vulkan	N/A	None
OpenGL	3.3	4.0+21%
Max Displays	2+100%	1

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs No (GeForce GT 425M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
Encoder	None	No
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	PureVideo HD VP4
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the GeForce GT 425M's 45W — a 34.9% difference. The GeForce GT 425M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (GeForce GT 425M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
TDP	64W	45W-30%
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	PCIe-powered
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70-7%	75°C
Perf/Watt	7.7	11.1+44%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240 (2014 vs 2013).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	GeForce GT 425M
MSRP	$80	—
Codename	GK107	GK107
Release	May 29 2014	April 1 2013
Ranking	#777	#857

Search GeForce GT 240 on Amazon

Search GeForce GT 425M on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.