GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTS 150M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240

2014Core: 993 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

2010Core: 783 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTS 150M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTS 150M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTS 150M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • Draws 64W instead of 106W, a 42W reduction.
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than GeForce GTS 150M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

GeForce GTS 150M

2010

Why buy it

  • 16.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

  • 2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
  • 65.6% higher power demand at 106W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
GeForce GTS 150M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 16.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (504 vs 495), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 28nm process instead of 40nm and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2010. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. GeForce GTS 150M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 240 vs GeForce GTS 150M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTS 150M

The GeForce GTS 150M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 783 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 106W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points. Launch price was $129.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the GeForce GTS 150M reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the GeForce GTS 150M uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 192 (GeForce GTS 150M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 0.6013 TFLOPS (GeForce GTS 150M).

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
G3D Mark Score
495
504+2%
Architecture
Kepler
Fermi
Process Node
28 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
384+100%
192
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS+27%
0.6013 TFLOPS
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
32
L1 Cache
32 KB
256 KB+700%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 1 GB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and 128-bit on the GeForce GTS 150M.

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB
1 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 11.1 (10_0) (GeForce GTS 150M). OpenGL: 3.3 vs 2.1. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
DirectX
10.1
11.1 (10_0)+10%
OpenGL
3.3+57%
2.1
Max Displays
2
2
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs PureVideo HD VP2 (GeForce GTS 150M). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs PureVideo HD VP2. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GTS 150M).

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
Encoder
None
PureVideo HD VP2
Decoder
PureVideo HD (VP4)
PureVideo HD VP2
Codecs
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the GeForce GTS 150M's 106W — a 49.4% difference. The GeForce GT 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (GeForce GTS 150M). Power connectors: None vs Legacy. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
TDP
64W-40%
106W
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
Legacy
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
0-100%
Temp (Load)
70-18%
85°C
Perf/Watt
7.7+60%
4.8
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240 (2014 vs 2010).

FeatureGeForce GT 240GeForce GTS 150M
MSRP
$80
Codename
GK107
GF106
Release
May 29 2014
September 13 2010
Ranking
#777
#791

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.