GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Vega 2

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 240

2014Core: 993 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon Vega 2

2021Core: 300 MHzBoost: 1900 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Vega 2 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 240

1 GB 64

495

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon Vega 2

Shared System RAM 15

506

+2.2%

Radeon HD 2600 XT

Radeon HD 8570D + HD 8470 Dual

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Vega 2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Vega 2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌326.7% higher power demand at 64W vs 15W.

Radeon Vega 2

2021

Why buy it

✅40.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅GeForce GT 240 is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 2 is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 15W instead of 64W, a 49W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon Vega 2 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 40.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.2% in PassMark G3D (506 vs 495), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Vega 2 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: the newer upscaling stack, FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, a 7nm process instead of 28nm, and a newer 2021 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, GeForce GT 240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p headroom, Radeon Vega 2 has the stronger long-term case.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon Vega 2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon Vega 2

The Radeon Vega 2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 506 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the Radeon Vega 2 reaches 506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 2 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 2). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 2).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
G3D Mark Score	495	506+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 5.1
Process Node	28 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	384	448+17%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	1.702 TFLOPS+123%
ROPs	16+100%	8
TMUs	32+14%	28

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 2 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 240 gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and System on the Radeon Vega 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR5	Shared
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	System
Bus Width	128-bit	System

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 2). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.3. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 3.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
DirectX	10.1	12 (12_1)+19%
Vulkan	N/A	1.3
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	3+50%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 2). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 2).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
Encoder	None	VCN 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	VCN 1.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the Radeon Vega 2's 15W — a 124.1% difference. The Radeon Vega 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 0W (Radeon Vega 2). Power connectors: None vs None. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 70.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
TDP	64W	15W-77%
Recommended PSU	300W	0W-100%
Power Connector	None	None
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70	70
Perf/Watt	7.7	33.7+338%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 240 came in at $80, while the Radeon Vega 2 launched at $0. On MSRP, Radeon Vega 2 was 100+% cheaper ($80 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) vs Infinity (Radeon Vega 2) — the Radeon Vega 2 offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Vega 2 (2021 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon Vega 2
MSRP	$80	$0-100%
Performance per Dollar	6.2	Infinity
Codename	GK107	Cezanne
Release	May 29 2014	April 13 2021
Ranking	#777	#601

Search GeForce GT 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon Vega 2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.