GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R5 M420

CPU

GPU

GeForce GT 240

2014Core: 993 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Radeon R5 M420

2016Core: 900 MHzBoost: 1000 MHz

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R5 M420 Performance Spectrum

GeForce GT 240

1 GB 64

495

0.0%

GeForce GTX 560 Ti 448

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER

Radeon R5 M420

0.5 GB 75

504

+1.8%

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R5 M420 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R5 M420: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 268.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 1.7 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 75W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R5 M420 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R5 M420

2016

Why buy it

✅25.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2016 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
275% HIGHER MSRP
$300 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.7 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌17.2% higher power demand at 75W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R5 M420 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 25.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 1.8% in PassMark G3D (504 vs 495), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $220 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $300, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 268.3% (6.2 vs 1.7), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R5 M420 still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R5 M420 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R5 M420

The Radeon R5 M420 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 15 2016. It features the GCN 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 1000 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 504 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the Radeon R5 M420 reaches 504 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R5 M420 uses GCN 2.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 768 (Radeon R5 M420). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 1.536 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M420).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
G3D Mark Score	495	504+2%
Architecture	Kepler	GCN 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	768+100%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7626 TFLOPS	1.536 TFLOPS+101%
ROPs	16	16
TMUs	32	48+50%
L1 Cache	32 KB	192 KB+500%
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R5 M420 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M420 carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M420.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	256 KB	256 KB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R5 M420). Vulkan: N/A vs N/A. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
DirectX	10.1	12 (11_1)+19%
Vulkan	N/A	N/A
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon R5 M420). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon R5 M420).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
Encoder	None	VCE 1.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,MPEG-4,VC-1,MPEG-2

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the Radeon R5 M420's 75W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce GT 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M420). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 80.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
TDP	64W-15%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70-13%	80
Perf/Watt	7.7+15%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 240 came in at $80, while the Radeon R5 M420 launched at $300. On MSRP, GeForce GT 240 was 73.3% cheaper ($220 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) vs 1.7 (Radeon R5 M420) — the GeForce GT 240 offers 264.7% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R5 M420 (2016 vs 2014).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R5 M420
MSRP	$80-73%	$300
Performance per Dollar	6.2+265%	1.7
Codename	GK107	Emerald
Release	May 29 2014	May 15 2016
Ranking	#777	#649

Search GeForce GT 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M420 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.