GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon HD8530M

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240

2014Core: 993 MHz
VS
AMD

Radeon HD8530M

2012Core: 675 MHz
Similar parts
·······

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon HD8530M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon HD8530M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon HD8530M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 0 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
  • More future proof: Kepler (2012−2018) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD8530M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 60% higher power demand at 64W vs 40W.

Radeon HD8530M

2012

Why buy it

  • 19.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 40W instead of 64W, a 24W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2012 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.2 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $80 MSRP).

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD8530M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 19.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward GeForce GT 240 instead at 495 vs 490, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GT 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM and a newer 2014 generation instead of 2012. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. Radeon HD8530M still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon HD8530M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

AMD

Radeon HD8530M

The Radeon HD8530M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 490 points.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the Radeon HD8530M reaches 490 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the Radeon HD8530M uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 640 (Radeon HD8530M). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD8530M).

FeatureGeForce GT 240Radeon HD8530M
G3D Mark Score
495+1%
490
Architecture
Kepler
GCN 1.0
Process Node
28 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
640+67%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.7626 TFLOPS
0.864 TFLOPS+13%
ROPs
16
16
TMUs
32
40+25%
L1 Cache
32 KB
160 KB+400%
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon HD8530M leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

FeatureGeForce GT 240Radeon HD8530M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD8530M carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and System on the Radeon HD8530M.

FeatureGeForce GT 240Radeon HD8530M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
System
Bus Width
128-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
256 KB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the Radeon HD8530M's 40W — a 46.2% difference. The Radeon HD8530M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (Radeon HD8530M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureGeForce GT 240Radeon HD8530M
TDP
64W
40W-38%
Recommended PSU
300W-14%
350W
Power Connector
None
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
111mm
Slots
1
Temp (Load)
70
Perf/Watt
7.7
12.3+60%
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is GeForce GT 240 (2014 vs 2012).

FeatureGeForce GT 240Radeon HD8530M
MSRP
$80
Codename
GK107
Heathrow
Release
May 29 2014
April 24 2012
Ranking
#777
#787

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.