GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R7 M265DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R7 M265DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R7 M265DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

GeForce GT 240

2014

Why buy it

✅Costs $69 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅Delivers 84.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 3.3 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $149 MSRP).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
✅Draws 64W instead of 75W, a 11W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Radeon R7 M265DX

2014

Why buy it

✅64.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌
86.3% HIGHER MSRP
$149 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.3 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
❌17.2% higher power demand at 75W vs 64W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M265DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 64.8% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.8% in PassMark G3D (499 vs 495), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce GT 240 is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

GeForce GT 240 makes the most sense to buy today. It is $69 cheaper on MSRP at $80 vs $149, and it leads G3D-per-dollar by 84.8% (6.2 vs 3.3), which is enough to swing the recommendation its way. Radeon R7 M265DX still makes more sense if max raw gaming performance matters more than value.

GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R7 M265DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240

The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R7 M265DX

The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the Radeon R7 M265DX reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R7 M265DX uses GCN, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
G3D Mark Score	495	499
Architecture	Kepler	GCN
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	896+133%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GT 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R7 M265DX leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265DX carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265DX.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	Unknown	Unknown
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 10.1 (GeForce GT 240) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX). Vulkan: N/A vs 1.2. OpenGL: 3.3 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 2.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
DirectX	10.1	12 (11_1)+19%
Vulkan	N/A	1.2
OpenGL	3.3	4.6+39%
Max Displays	2	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: None (GeForce GT 240) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP4) vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce GT 240) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
Encoder	None	VCE 2.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD (VP4)	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the Radeon R7 M265DX's 75W — a 15.8% difference. The GeForce GT 240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX). Power connectors: None vs Mobile. Card length: 168mm vs 0mm, occupying 1 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 85.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
TDP	64W-15%	75W
Recommended PSU	300W-14%	350W
Power Connector	None	Mobile
Length	168mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	1	0-100%
Temp (Load)	70-18%	85
Perf/Watt	7.7+15%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the GeForce GT 240 came in at $80, while the Radeon R7 M265DX launched at $149. On MSRP, GeForce GT 240 was 46.3% cheaper ($69 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) vs 3.3 (Radeon R7 M265DX) — the GeForce GT 240 offers 87.9% better value.

Feature	GeForce GT 240	Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP	$80-46%	$149
Performance per Dollar	6.2+88%	3.3
Codename	GK107	—
Release	May 29 2014	June 4 2014
Ranking	#777	#800

Search GeForce GT 240 on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M265DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.