
GeForce GT 240

Radeon R4E
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R4E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R4E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R4E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 240
2014Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.2 vs 4.9 G3D/$ ($80 MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R4E across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2014 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌28% higher power demand at 64W vs 50W.
Radeon R4E
2017Why buy it
- ✅31.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 64W, a 14W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2017 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌25% HIGHER MSRP$100 MSRPvs$80 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 4.9 vs 6.2 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs $80 MSRP).
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 240 vs Radeon R4E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 240
The GeForce GT 240 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 495 points. Launch price was $89.

Radeon R4E
The Radeon R4E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 20 2017. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1183 MHz to 1124 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 487 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 240 scores 495 and the Radeon R4E reaches 487 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 240 is built on Kepler while the Radeon R4E uses GCN 4.0, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 240) vs 384 (Radeon R4E). Raw compute: 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 240) vs 0.9085 TFLOPS (Radeon R4E).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | Radeon R4E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 495+2% | 487 |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 4.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.7626 TFLOPS | 0.9085 TFLOPS+19% |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 96 KB+200% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 240 gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon R4E leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | Radeon R4E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 240 has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R4E carries 512 MB. GeForce GT 240 gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 240 and 64-bit on the Radeon R4E. L2 Cache: 256 KB (GeForce GT 240) vs 512 KB (Radeon R4E) — the Radeon R4E has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | Radeon R4E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 240 draws 64W versus the Radeon R4E's 50W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon R4E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 300W (GeForce GT 240) vs 350W (Radeon R4E). Power connectors: None vs None.
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | Radeon R4E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 64W | 50W-22% |
| Recommended PSU | 300W-14% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | None |
| Length | 168mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 7.7 | 9.7+26% |
Value Analysis
At launch, the GeForce GT 240 came in at $80, while the Radeon R4E launched at $100. On MSRP, GeForce GT 240 was 20% cheaper ($20 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 6.2 (GeForce GT 240) vs 4.9 (Radeon R4E) — the GeForce GT 240 offers 26.5% better value. The newer card here is Radeon R4E (2017 vs 2014).
| Feature | GeForce GT 240 | Radeon R4E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $80-20% | $100 |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.2+27% | 4.9 |
| Codename | GK107 | Lexa |
| Release | May 29 2014 | April 20 2017 |
| Ranking | #777 | #773 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














