
GeForce GT 425M

Radeon Vega 2
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon Vega 2 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon Vega 2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon Vega 2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
GeForce GT 425M
2013Why buy it
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs Unknown).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Vega 2 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌2013 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌200% higher power demand at 45W vs 15W.
Radeon Vega 2
2021Why buy it
- ✅41.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅GeForce GT 425M is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon Vega 2 is the less risky modern option long term.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 45W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2021 hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
GeForce GT 425M vs Radeon Vega 2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

GeForce GT 425M
The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

Radeon Vega 2
The Radeon Vega 2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 506 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GT 425M scores 499 and the Radeon Vega 2 reaches 506 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GT 425M is built on Kepler while the Radeon Vega 2 uses GCN 5.1, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 384 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 448 (Radeon Vega 2). Raw compute: 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M) vs 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 499 | 506+1% |
| Architecture | Kepler | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 448+17% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.4216 TFLOPS | 1.702 TFLOPS+304% |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+14% | 28 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GT 425M gets NVIDIA DLSS, which still tends to look cleaner in motion. The Radeon Vega 2 leans on FSR, which is flexible and widely supported, but usually a bit rougher at the same settings.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GT 425M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Vega 2 carries 0 MB. GeForce GT 425M gives you 100+% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 128-bit on the GeForce GT 425M and System on the Radeon Vega 2.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | System |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M) vs 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 2). Vulkan: None vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.0 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 1 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.0 | 12 (12_1)+9% |
| Vulkan | None | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.0 | 4.6+15% |
| Max Displays | 1 | 3+200% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: No (GeForce GT 425M) vs VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 2). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP4 vs VCN 1.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 2).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | No | VCN 1.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP4 | VCN 1.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GT 425M draws 45W versus the Radeon Vega 2's 15W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Vega 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (GeForce GT 425M) vs 0W (Radeon Vega 2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70.
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 15W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 0W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.1 | 33.7+204% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon Vega 2 (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | GeForce GT 425M | Radeon Vega 2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GK107 | Cezanne |
| Release | April 1 2013 | April 13 2021 |
| Ranking | #857 | #601 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














