Radeon 3020e vs Radeon R7 M265DX

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 3020e vs Radeon R7 M265DX FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 3020e vs Radeon R7 M265DX: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 3020e

2019

Why buy it

✅Radeon R7 M265DX is already obsolete for modern gaming, so Radeon 3020e is the less risky modern option long term.
✅Draws 50W instead of 75W, a 25W reduction.
✅More future proof: GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265DX across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌2019 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM already sits in legacy territory for modern games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 3.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $149 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M265DX

2014

Why buy it

✅24.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 3.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($149 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 75W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M265DX is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 24.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Radeon 3020e instead at 505 vs 499, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon 3020e is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 14nm process instead of 28nm and a newer 2019 generation instead of 2014. That makes it the less risky pick as game demands keep moving.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M265DX makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M265DX is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 3020e has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 3020e vs Radeon R7 M265DX Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon 3020e

The Radeon 3020e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 505 points.

Radeon R7 M265DX

The Radeon R7 M265DX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 4 2014. It features the GCN architecture. It has 896 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 3020e scores 505 and the Radeon R7 M265DX reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 3020e is built on GCN 4.0 while the Radeon R7 M265DX uses GCN, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon 3020e) vs 896 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
G3D Mark Score	505+1%	499
Architecture	GCN 4.0	GCN
Process Node	14 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	512	896+75%
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards ship with 512 MB of GDDR5. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Radeon 3020e and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265DX.

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	0.5 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon 3020e) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon R7 M265DX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_1)
Vulkan	1.2	1.2
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	3+50%	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon 3020e) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7 M265DX). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon 3020e) vs H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1 (Radeon R7 M265DX).

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
Encoder	VCN 1.0	VCE 2.0
Decoder	VCN 1.0	UVD 4.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,MPEG-4,VC-1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 3020e draws 50W versus the Radeon R7 M265DX's 75W — a 40% difference. The Radeon 3020e is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 3020e) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265DX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
TDP	50W-33%	75W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	—	0mm
Height	—	0mm
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	85
Perf/Watt	10.1+51%	6.7

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Radeon 3020e came in at $0, while the Radeon R7 M265DX launched at $149. On MSRP, Radeon 3020e was 100+% cheaper ($149 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): Infinity (Radeon 3020e) vs 3.3 (Radeon R7 M265DX) — the Radeon 3020e offers Infinity% better value. The newer card here is Radeon 3020e (2019 vs 2014).

Feature	Radeon 3020e	Radeon R7 M265DX
MSRP	$0-100%	$149
Performance per Dollar	Infinity	3.3
Codename	Polaris 23	—
Release	May 13 2019	June 4 2014
Ranking	#757	#800

Search Radeon 3020e on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M265DX on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.