Radeon 625 vs Firepro M4100

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon 625 is positioned at rank #357 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon 625

#347

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

1008%

#349

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

914%

#350

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

911%

#354

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

829%

#355

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

823%

#357

Radeon 625

MSRP: $100|Avg: $50

100%

#359

Radeon R7 M350

MSRP: $100|Avg: $100

99%

#360

GeForce 920MX

MSRP: $100|Avg: $54

99%

#361

Radeon RX Vega11 Ryzen 7 3750H

MSRP: $150|Avg: $45

99%

#362

Radeon HD 7670A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $40

97%

#363

Radeon Vega 8

MSRP: $150|Avg: $40

97%

#367

GeForce 615

MSRP: $50|Avg: $15

94%

#369

Radeon Ryzen 7 6800HS

MSRP: $600|Avg: $600

93%

#370

GeForce GT 730A

MSRP: $75|Avg: $20

92%

#372

Radeon HD 7660G

MSRP: $50|Avg: $50

89%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon 625 is significantly newer (2019 vs 2013). The Radeon 625 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Firepro M4100 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon 625 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Firepro M4100 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity	GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) (28nm)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	⚡ Higher Power Consumption	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Firepro M4100 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $30 versus $50 for the Radeon 625, it costs 40% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 63.9% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+63.9%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon 625 Benchmark Check

Firepro M4100 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 625 and Firepro M4100

Radeon 625

The Radeon 625 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,077 points.

Firepro M4100

The Firepro M4100 is manufactured by an unknown manufacturer. It was released in October 16 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 670 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,059 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 625 scores 1,077 and the Firepro M4100 reaches 1,059 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 625 is built on GCN 3.0 while the Firepro M4100 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 625) vs 384 (Firepro M4100). Raw compute: 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon 625) vs 0.5146 TFLOPS (Firepro M4100).

Feature	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
G3D Mark Score	1,077+2%	1,059
Architecture	GCN 3.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	384	384
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.7864 TFLOPS+53%	0.5146 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	8
TMUs	24	24
L1 Cache	96 KB	96 KB
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 625 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Firepro M4100 has 2 GB. The Firepro M4100 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 128 KB (Radeon 625) vs 256 KB (Firepro M4100) — the Firepro M4100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit
L2 Cache	128 KB	256 KB+100%

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 625 draws 50W versus the Firepro M4100's 30W — a 50% difference. The Firepro M4100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 625) vs 350W (Firepro M4100). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon 625	Firepro M4100
TDP	50W	30W-40%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	—	82mm
Height	—	70mm
Slots	—	1
Temp (Load)	—	75°C
Perf/Watt	21.5	35.3+64%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon 625 launched at $100 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the Firepro M4100 launched at $0 and now averages $30. The Firepro M4100 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 21.5 (Radeon 625) vs 35.3 (Firepro M4100) — the Firepro M4100 offers 64.2% better value. The Radeon 625 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2013).